Sat, 4 Oct 2025, 05:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
24'
Normal Goal → H. Motoyama
47'
Yellow Card
56'
Substitution 1 → Lucao
60'
Substitution 1 → A. Boudah
61'
Substitution 2 → K. Hashimoto
67'
Normal Goal → J. Okumura
74'
Substitution 3 → M. Ohara
75'
Substitution 2 → Y. Suzuki
75'
Substitution 3 → M. Matsumoto
75'
Substitution 4 → H. Iwabuchi
83'
Yellow Card
84'
Substitution 4 → J. Geria
84'
Substitution 5 → K. Taniguchi
88'
Substitution 5 → R. Takeuchi
90+2'
Substitution 6 → K. Fujii
90+3'
Yellow Card
90+7'
Substitution 6 → H. Uemura
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal1
2Shots off Goal4
10Total Shots5
6Blocked Shots0
7Shots insidebox3
3Shots outsidebox2
11Fouls13
4Corner Kicks5
2Offsides3
68Ball Possession32
2Yellow Cards1
0Goalkeeper Saves1
517Total passes234
408Passes accurate139
79Passes %59
Starting Lineups
Albirex Niigata1:1
Starting XI
21R. TashiroG
31Y. HorigomeD
30J. OkumuraM
99Y. OnoF
15F. HayakawaD
8E. ShiraiM
41M. HasegawaF
5M. FitzgeraldD
22T. AraiM
25S. FujiwaraD
28T. ShimamuraM
Fagiano OkayamaUnknown
Starting XI
49S. BrodersenG
4K. AbeUnknown
18D. TagamiD
15K. KudoD
26H. MotoyamaM
33Kamiya YutaM
41E. MiyamotoM
50H. KatoUnknown
27T. KimuraUnknown
8A. EsakaF
22K. IchimiF
Head-to-Head
1
Wins
5
Draws
6
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Albirex Niigata
Form: L-D-L-L-L
Fagiano Okayama
Form: L-D-L-L-L
Record
0 W
2 D
8 L
•
3 W
1 D
6 L
Goals Per Game
0.6
Scored
vs
0.9
Scored
1.7
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
30%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:0.5
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:2.3
Scored
Home:0.7
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:2.5
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1425
Average
1511
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1404
↓ Momentum (-21)
1504
↓ Momentum (-7)
Expected Outcome
26%
Home Win
31%
Draw
43%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1433
Attack
1449
1472
Defence
1563
Recent Form
1404
Attack
1410
1459
Defence
1564
Post-Match Changes
+2
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

