Sat, 23 Aug 2025, 23:30
Full Time
Match Timeline
34'
Normal Goal
37'
Yellow Card
38'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 → J. Dean
57'
Yellow Card
59'
Yellow Card
64'
Normal Goal → M. Iloski
66'
Yellow Card
69'
Substitution 2 → M. Haile-Selassie
69'
Substitution 3 → A. Franco
73'
Normal Goal
74'
Substitution 1 → M. Uhre
74'
Substitution 2 → C. Sullivan
75'
Substitution 4 → K. Acosta
75'
Substitution 5 → T. Barlow
80'
Normal Goal
81'
Substitution 3 → C. Donovan
84'
Substitution 4 → J. Rafanello
84'
Substitution 5 → A. Bedoya
Match Statistics
8Shots on Goal2
9Shots off Goal3
23Total Shots7
6Blocked Shots2
11Shots insidebox2
12Shots outsidebox5
16Fouls10
6Corner Kicks4
3Offsides1
52Ball Possession48
3Yellow Cards2
2Goalkeeper Saves4
455Total passes428
387Passes accurate353
85Passes %82
2.39expected_goals0.21
-2goals_prevented-2
Starting Lineups
Philadelphia Union1:1
Starting XI
76A. RickG
27K. WagnerD
33Q. SullivanM
9T. BariboF
29O. MakhanyaD
21D. Jean JacquesM
20B. DamianiF
5J. GlesnesD
4J. LukicM
39F. WestfieldD
32M. IloskiM
Chicago Fire1:1
Starting XI
1C. BradyG
15A. GutmanD
17B. GutierrezM
19J. BambaF
3J. ElliottD
42D. D'AvillaM
9H. CuypersF
38C. CuppsD
35S. OregelM
11P. ZinckernagelF
2L. BarrosoD
Head-to-Head
17
Wins
9
Draws
11
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Philadelphia Union
Form: L-W-D-D-W
Chicago Fire
Form: W-D-W-W-D
Record
5 W
3 D
2 L
•
4 W
3 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
2.0
Scored
vs
1.6
Scored
1.0
Conceded
vs
1.4
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.2
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:0.8
Scored
Home:1.7
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:1.5
Away:1.3
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1608
Good
1472
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1637
↑ Momentum (+29)
1477
↑ Momentum (+5)
Expected Outcome
50%
Home Win
27%
Draw
23%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1574
Attack
1446
1586
Defence
1481
Recent Form
1601
Attack
1455
1612
Defence
1496
Post-Match Changes
+7
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

