🟨
South Korea1-0El Salvador
Sat, 13 Sept 2025, 23:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

31'
A. McFadden🟨
Yellow Card
37'
T. Davila🟨
Yellow Card
46'
P. Barnes🔄
Substitution 1 → B. Etou
46'
A. McFadden🔄
Substitution 1 → A. Dia
46'
N. McCabe🔄
Substitution 2 → A. Perez
46'
C. Lancaster🔄
Substitution 3 → J. Wilson
48'
R. Mertz🟨
Yellow Card
50'
K. Lambert
Normal Goal → S. Totsch
69'
B. Jacquesson🔄
Substitution 2 → C. Boone
70'
L. Biasi🔄
Substitution 3 → C. Ahl
72'
B. Dayes🔄
Substitution 4 → S. Gleadle
78'
B. Ownby🔄
Substitution 5 → R. Serrano
84'
B. Sample🔄
Substitution 4 → B. Larsen
84'
R. Mertz🔄
Substitution 5 → J. Bouregy
87'
A. Perez
Normal Goal → J. Wilson

Starting Lineups

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsPittsburgh RiverhoundsUnknown

Starting XI

1E. DickUnknown
16R. YdrachUnknown
5S. SuberUnknown
23G. VacterUnknown
3P. BarnesUnknown
2D. GriffinUnknown
15B. SampleUnknown
13L. BiasiUnknown
9A. WilliamsUnknown
10B. JacquessonUnknown
14R. MertzUnknown

Louisville CityLouisville CityUnknown

Starting XI

1D. LasUnknown
4S. TotschUnknown
2A. McFaddenUnknown
32K. AdamsUnknown
24J. JonesUnknown
83B. DayesUnknown
17T. DavilaUnknown
10B. OwnbyUnknown
53C. LancasterUnknown
31K. LambertUnknown
11N. McCabeUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Form: W-L-D-L-D
Louisville City
Louisville City
Form: W-W-D-W-W
Record
2 W
6 D
2 L
7 W
2 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
1.3
Scored
vs
2.2
Scored
1.1
Conceded
vs
1.2
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:1.2
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.0
Scored
Home:2.2
Away:2.2
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:0.8

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1627
Good
1744
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1620
↓ Momentum (-7)
1810
↑ Momentum (+66)
Expected Outcome
24%
Home Win
29%
Draw
47%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1504
Attack
1650
1666
Defence
1615
Recent Form
1513
Attack
1669
1669
Defence
1643
Post-Match Changes
-12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.