⚽️
České Budějovice II2-2Příbram II
Sat, 30 Aug 2025, 11:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

10'
S. Fornes
Normal Goal → C. Nevin
23'
M. Kristell🟨
Yellow Card
31'
T. Skoog🟨
Yellow Card
35'
L. Russell
Penalty
45'
S. Fornes
Normal Goal → S. Kullberg
53'
M. Kamogawa🟨
Yellow Card
56'
D. Dupuy🔄
Substitution 1 → E. Hammarback
61'
M. Persson
Normal Goal → T. Skoog
63'
S. Amano🔄
Substitution 2 → L. Gustafsson
71'
E. Nilsson🟨
Yellow Card
75'
M. Ivanovic🔄
Substitution 1 → K. Kosola
82'
M. Kamogawa🔄
Substitution 3 → B. Nielsdottir
82'
J. Harrysson🔄
Substitution 4 → S. Redenstrand
84'
K. Olesen🔄
Substitution 2 → P. Winblad
88'
S. Fornes🔄
Substitution 3 → A. Plantin
88'
T. Skoog🔄
Substitution 4 → B. Persson

Starting Lineups

Malmö FF WMalmö FF WUnknown

Starting XI

31M. OhmanUnknown
15A. MartenssonUnknown
4E. LofqvistUnknown
5S. KullbergUnknown
18C. NevinUnknown
17K. OlesenUnknown
11M. KristellUnknown
16T. SkoogUnknown
8M. PerssonUnknown
9M. IvanovicUnknown
23S. FornesUnknown

Växjö WVäxjö WUnknown

Starting XI

1M. OstergaardUnknown
4M. NurmelaUnknown
21D. DupuyUnknown
16E. WiederUnknown
7N. KarlssonUnknown
26S. AmanoUnknown
27J. HarryssonUnknown
33E. NilssonUnknown
8M. BodinUnknown
20M. KamogawaUnknown
19L. RussellUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Malmö FF W
Malmö FF W
Form: W-W-W-W-W
Växjö W
Växjö W
Form: W-L-W-L-D
Record
8 W
1 D
1 L
4 W
1 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
2.4
Scored
vs
1.7
Scored
0.8
Conceded
vs
2.1
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
60%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:2.7
Conceded
Home:0.0
Away:1.3
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:2.4
Conceded
Home:3.0
Away:1.2

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1546
Average
1441
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1611
↑ Momentum (+66)
1417
↓ Momentum (-24)
Expected Outcome
46%
Home Win
29%
Draw
25%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1492
Attack
1400
1570
Defence
1463
Recent Form
1496
Attack
1424
1631
Defence
1457
Post-Match Changes
+9
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.