🟨
Colombia0-0Congo DR
Sun, 21 Sept 2025, 12:30
Full Time

Match Timeline

6'
J. Hauge
Normal Goal
61'
I. Fossum🔄
Substitution 1 → M. Zeidan
67'
Santeri Väänänen🟨
Yellow Card
70'
H. Aleesami
Own Goal
77'
D. Duris🔄
Substitution 2 → O. Saeter
77'
S. Nordli🔄
Substitution 3 → O. Selnaes
79'
Ole Christian Saeter🟨
Yellow Card
81'
F. Sjovold🔄
Substitution 1 → V. Nielsen
81'
K. Hogh🔄
Substitution 2 → A. Helmersen
81'
H. Evjen🔄
Substitution 3 → A. Klynge
81'
D. Bassi🔄
Substitution 4 → I. Maatta
90+1'
Ole Selnaes🟨
Yellow Card
90+1'
Isak Dybvik Määttä🟨
Yellow Card

Match Statistics

2Shots on Goal3
5Shots off Goal4
17Total Shots12
10Blocked Shots5
10Shots insidebox10
7Shots outsidebox2
17Fouls5
8Corner Kicks3
1Offsides1
51Ball Possession49
3Yellow Cards1
2Goalkeeper Saves2
509Total passes489
430Passes accurate411
84Passes %84
0.9expected_goals2.13

Starting Lineups

RosenborgRosenborg1:1

Starting XI

1S. TangvikG
19A. PereiraD
7S. NordliM
35E. K. CeideF
21T. NemcikD
6S. VaananenM
39D. IslamovicF
38M. K. CeideD
8I. FossumM
16A. F. WitryD
29D. DurisM

Bodo/GlimtBodo/Glimt1:1

Starting XI

12N. HaikinG
15F. BjorkanD
19S. FetM
10J. HaugeF
5H. AleesamiD
7P. BergM
9K. HoghF
4O. L. BjortuftD
26H. EvjenM
24D. BassiF
20F. SjovoldD

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Rosenborg
Rosenborg
Form: W-L-L-W-W
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
Form: D-W-W-L-W
Record
6 W
1 D
3 L
7 W
2 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
2.0
Scored
vs
3.4
Scored
1.2
Conceded
vs
1.0
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
50%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.8
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:0.5
Away:1.7
Scored
Home:4.2
Away:2.6
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:1.2

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1680
Good
1723
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1727
↑ Momentum (+47)
1763
↑ Momentum (+40)
Expected Outcome
30%
Home Win
32%
Draw
38%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1560
Attack
1697
1595
Defence
1631
Recent Form
1562
Attack
1726
1620
Defence
1658
Post-Match Changes
+1
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.