🟨
Dainava1-0TransINVEST Vilnius
Sat, 6 Sept 2025, 12:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

57'
H. Danielsen🔄
Substitution 1 → J. Sannes
64'
E. Muhle
Normal Goal
65'
B. Andersen🔄
Substitution 2 → Y. Chaib
65'
S. Pettersen🔄
Substitution 3 → M. D. Volden
67'
C. Glenna🟨
Yellow Card
71'
J. Sannes
Normal Goal
74'
C. Glenna🔄
Substitution 1 → S. Mladenovic
74'
R. Pllana🔄
Substitution 2 → F. S. Kimerud
74'
B. Evensen🔄
Substitution 3 → A. Giske
85'
O. Johnsen🔄
Substitution 4 → E. Jaf
85'
A. Bakeng-Rogne🔄
Substitution 5 → O. Henriksrud
85'
M. Wenneberg🔄
Substitution 4 → T. Nygaard
85'
D. dos Santos Jonker🔄
Substitution 5 → M. Torp
89'
K. Svarteberg🟨
Yellow Card

Starting Lineups

Pors GrenlandPors GrenlandUnknown

Starting XI

1P. HagenUnknown
3S. OstbyUnknown
5T. GarstadUnknown
6J. DahlbyUnknown
16B. EvensenUnknown
4K. SvartebergUnknown
8A. Bakeng-RogneUnknown
15R. PllanaUnknown
9O. JohnsenUnknown
21C. GlennaUnknown
29P. RosvikUnknown

Eik-TønsbergEik-TønsbergUnknown

Starting XI

1C. BuggeUnknown
3V. S. RobergUnknown
4N. NilsenUnknown
6H. DanielsenUnknown
23A. LarsenUnknown
10D. dos Santos JonkerUnknown
11W. KurtovicUnknown
16B. AndersenUnknown
18S. PettersenUnknown
7E. MuhleUnknown
25M. WennebergUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Pors Grenland
Pors Grenland
Form: L-W-W-L-D
Eik-Tønsberg
Eik-Tønsberg
Form: W-L-L-L-W
Record
4 W
3 D
3 L
3 W
3 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.7
Scored
vs
1.0
Scored
1.6
Conceded
vs
1.4
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:2.0
Scored
Home:1.2
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.0
Away:1.8

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1509
Average
1548
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1532
↑ Momentum (+23)
1576
↑ Momentum (+28)
Expected Outcome
30%
Home Win
33%
Draw
37%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1468
Attack
1517
1511
Defence
1532
Recent Form
1448
Attack
1523
1530
Defence
1536
Post-Match Changes
-13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.