🟨
Corpus Christi1-2Portland Hearts of Pine
Sat, 2 Aug 2025, 12:00
Virsliga
Latvia
Latvia
Full Time

Match Timeline

34'
D. Guèye
Penalty
45+1'
M. Polasek🟨
Yellow Card
60'
D. Guèye
Normal Goal
61'
R. Bečers🔄
Substitution 1 → F. Hašek
65'
M. Polášek🔄
Substitution 2 → G. Žaleiko
66'
Ē. Boroduška🔄
Substitution 3 → A. Pētersons
66'
K. Emenike🔄
Substitution 4 → R. Deružinskis
69'
A. Traoré🔄
Substitution 1 → T. Samba
69'
D. Guèye🔄
Substitution 2 → A. Ogunniyi
69'
D. Patijčuks🔄
Substitution 3 → K. Leidsman
75'
A. Babic🟨
Yellow Card
75'
K. Aļekseičiks
Normal Goal → M. Hašek
80'
E. Girdvainis🟨
Yellow Card
81'
B. Melnis🔄
Substitution 4 → A. Saveļjevs
82'
M. Laušić🔄
Substitution 5 → Dodô

Starting Lineups

FS JelgavaFS JelgavaUnknown

Starting XI

1A. DvořákUnknown
15O. UllmanUnknown
17A. YuzvakUnknown
22V. PursUnknown
5K. AļekseičiksUnknown
6K. PenkevicsUnknown
28M. PolášekUnknown
11M. HašekUnknown
9R. BečersUnknown
20K. EmenikeUnknown
25Ē. BoroduškaUnknown

FK LiepajaFK LiepajaUnknown

Starting XI

12D. PetkovićUnknown
35V. SorokinsUnknown
3K. IļjinsUnknown
91M. LaušićUnknown
2E. GirdvainisUnknown
72A. BabićUnknown
14D. GuèyeUnknown
28A. KorobenkoUnknown
70D. PatijčuksUnknown
17B. MelnisUnknown
8A. TraoréUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
Form: L-W-L-L-L
FK Liepaja
FK Liepaja
Form: W-L-W-L-W
Record
2 W
1 D
7 L
7 W
1 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
0.4
Scored
vs
1.8
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
0.8
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
50%
BTTS
20%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:0.5
Away:0.3
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:2.0
Scored
Home:1.6
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:0.8

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1503
Average
1554
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1549
↑ Momentum (+46)
1632
↑ Momentum (+78)
Expected Outcome
29%
Home Win
32%
Draw
39%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1439
Attack
1509
1540
Defence
1560
Recent Form
1436
Attack
1554
1589
Defence
1606
Post-Match Changes
-12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.