Sun, 15 Jun 2025, 16:00
1. Liga
Latvia
Full Time
Match Timeline
46'
J. Nerugals🔄Substitution 1 → M. Muizzemnieks
46'
G. Zaleiko🔄Substitution 2 → M. Saidy
46'
R. Sibass🔄Substitution 3 → M. Derkach
46'
R. Ndjiki🔄Substitution 4 → F. Konate
46'
A. Petrovskis🔄Substitution 1 → R. Steponavicus
56'
D. Sirbu🔄Substitution 2 → M. Kere
63'
K. Uzis🟨Yellow Card
70'
A. Juhnevics⚽Normal Goal → M. Saidy
71'
D. Sedols⚽Normal Goal → A. Juhnevics
74'
F. Konate⚽Normal Goal → L. Gandzs
76'
L. Gandzs🔄Substitution 5 → K. Kirsanovs
79'
B. Bekima🔄Substitution 3 → R. Romanovskis
79'
H. Joksts🔄Substitution 4 → A. Maulins
87'
D. Putrans🔄Substitution 5 → H. Kolesnikovics
89'
R. Steponavicus⚽Normal Goal
90'
F. Konate⚽Normal Goal → D. Sedols
Starting Lineups
Rīgas FS IIUnknown
Starting XI
1J. NerugalsUnknown
3P. PutninsUnknown
4K. IlenansUnknown
5R. NdjikiUnknown
8D. SedolsUnknown
9G. ZaleikoUnknown
10A. JuhnevicsUnknown
11L. GandzsUnknown
15K. RudensUnknown
17R. SibassUnknown
18I. MajorovsUnknown
Tukums IIUnknown
Starting XI
77V. KapustinsUnknown
2R. DzeguzeUnknown
3M. MihoubiUnknown
5A. PetrovskisUnknown
6H. JokstsUnknown
7I. AtliginsUnknown
10D. PutransUnknown
15E. AnsevicsUnknown
17D. SirbuUnknown
32K. UzisUnknown
72B. BekimaUnknown
Head-to-Head
1
Wins
1
Draws
6
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Rīgas FS II
Form: W-D-D-W-W
Tukums II
Form: L-L-W-D-L
Record
4 W
4 D
2 L
•
3 W
2 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
1.8
Scored
vs
1.1
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.8
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.8
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.5
Scored
Home:1.6
Away:0.6
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:2.0
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1609
Good
1424
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1646
↑ Momentum (+37)
1385
↓ Momentum (-39)
Expected Outcome
56%
Home Win
25%
Draw
19%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1622
Attack
1447
1545
Defence
1393
Recent Form
1647
Attack
1446
1530
Defence
1363
Post-Match Changes
+5
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.