🟨
South Korea1-0El Salvador
Wed, 16 Jul 2025, 16:00
Ykkönen
Finland
Finland
Full Time

Match Timeline

12'
E. Tanninen
Normal Goal
20'
J. Lehto
Normal Goal
45'
J. Lemio🟨
Yellow Card
56'
E. Tanninen🔄
Substitution 1 → E. Ylonen
56'
O. Balde🔄
Substitution 2 → J. Kivijarvi
59'
B. Haruna
Normal Goal
71'
L. Bradbury🔄
Substitution 1 → N. Puustinen
71'
J. Rantanen🔄
Substitution 2 → J. Riissanen
73'
S. Seidu🔄
Substitution 3 → K. Haarma
73'
E. Kauppinen🔄
Substitution 4 → L. Paasisalo
74'
E. Ylonen🟨
Yellow Card
84'
Layon🔄
Substitution 3 → E. Kiiskila
90+1'
B. Haruna🔄
Substitution 4 → F. Lamminen
90+1'
E. Puolitaival🔄
Substitution 5 → A. Tuunanen
90+5'
Unknown Player🟨
Yellow Card

Starting Lineups

FC jazzFC jazzUnknown

Starting XI

28R. KoikkalainenUnknown
2J. LemioUnknown
3E. VesalaUnknown
5J. LakkamakiUnknown
7B. HarunaUnknown
9LayonUnknown
10J. LehtoUnknown
11J. RantanenUnknown
15L. BradburyUnknown
20V. KetonenUnknown
23L. KyllonenUnknown

KuPS AkatemiaKuPS AkatemiaUnknown

Starting XI

12J. AimolaUnknown
6J. HanhinevaUnknown
7E. PuolitaivalUnknown
8R. SaloUnknown
9M. Ahmad Al SheikhUnknown
13E. KauppinenUnknown
14E. RasanenUnknown
16E. TanninenUnknown
18O. BaldeUnknown
19L. KohonenUnknown
37S. SeiduUnknown

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

FC jazz
FC jazz
Form: W-W-W-L-L
KuPS Akatemia
KuPS Akatemia
Form: L-W-L-D-W
Record
7 W
0 D
3 L
3 W
1 D
6 L
Goals Per Game
2.7
Scored
vs
1.8
Scored
2.0
Conceded
vs
2.2
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:3.7
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:2.2
Away:1.8
Scored
Home:2.2
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.8
Away:2.8

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1513
Average
1489
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1587
↑ Momentum (+74)
1475
↓ Momentum (-14)
Expected Outcome
36%
Home Win
33%
Draw
31%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1548
Attack
1503
1454
Defence
1448
Recent Form
1600
Attack
1486
1489
Defence
1457
Post-Match Changes
+9
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.