Sun, 5 Apr 2026, 00:30
Full Time
Match Timeline
1'
P. Zinckernagel⚽Normal Goal → J. Bamba
61'
A. Muyl🔄Substitution 1 → W. Madrigal
61'
M. Corcoran🔄Substitution 2 → P. Yazbek
62'
J. Elliott🔄Substitution 1 → C. Cupps
72'
Anton Salétros🟨Yellow Card
78'
Dje Tah D'Avilla🟨Yellow Card
78'
C. Espinoza🔄Substitution 3 → A. Qasem
78'
D. Lovitz🔄Substitution 4 → R. Baker-Whiting
80'
Edvard Sandvik Tagseth🟨Yellow Card
81'
M. Haile-Selassie🔄Substitution 2 → J. Shokalook
89'
E. Tagseth🔄Substitution 5 → W. Pacius
90+1'
P. Zinckernagel🔄Substitution 3 → V. Radojevic
Match Statistics
3Shots on Goal4
2Shots off Goal4
10Total Shots9
5Blocked Shots1
4Shots insidebox6
6Shots outsidebox3
19Fouls13
1Corner Kicks3
2Offsides3
39Ball Possession61
2Yellow Cards1
4Goalkeeper Saves2
374Total passes573
298Passes accurate473
80Passes %83
1.13expected_goals0.7
0goals_prevented0
Starting Lineups
Chicago Fire1:1
Starting XI
1C. BradyG
15A. GutmanD
19J. BambaM
7M. Haile-SelassieF
4M. MbokaziD
6A. SaletrosM
17R. LodF
3J. ElliottD
42D. D'AvillaM
2L. BarrosoD
11P. ZinckernagelM
Nashville SC1:1
Starting XI
99B. SchwakeG
2D. LovitzD
19A. MuylM
9S. SurridgeF
3M. WoledziD
20E. TagsethM
10H. MukhtarF
4J. PalaciosD
16M. CorcoranM
31A. NajarD
7C. EspinozaM
Head-to-Head
6
Wins
2
Draws
2
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Chicago Fire
Form: W-W-L-L-D
Nashville SC
Form: W-D-W-D-W
Record
3 W
3 D
4 L
•
6 W
3 D
1 L
Goals Per Game
1.4
Scored
vs
2.2
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
0.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
60%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
40%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.3
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.8
Away:1.0
Scored
Home:3.0
Away:1.0
Conceded
Home:0.7
Away:0.3
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1483
Average
1599
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1491
↑ Momentum (+9)
1681
↑ Momentum (+82)
Expected Outcome
24%
Home Win
29%
Draw
47%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1487
Attack
1565
1476
Defence
1566
Recent Form
1526
Attack
1629
1471
Defence
1598
Post-Match Changes
+11
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.