Tue, 5 May 2026, 00:30
Liga Profesional Argentina
Argentina
Full Time
Match Timeline
18'
Normal Goal → G. A. Lodico
22'
Card upgrade
23'
Red Card
36'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 → M. Garnerone
46'
Substitution 1 → N. Guerra
61'
Substitution 2 → M. Fonseca
62'
Substitution 2 → S. Rosane
62'
Substitution 3 → M. Bajamich
63'
Normal Goal → J. Lazaro
70'
Substitution 4 → F. Romero
74'
Substitution 3 → A. Massaccesi
74'
Substitution 4 → J. Mendez
83'
Substitution 5 → B. Pieroni
83'
Substitution 5 → J. Acevedo
90+3'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal7
6Shots off Goal10
9Total Shots22
1Blocked Shots5
3Shots insidebox16
6Shots outsidebox6
6Fouls15
3Corner Kicks8
0Offsides4
43Ball Possession57
1Yellow Cards1
1Red Cards0
5Goalkeeper Saves1
338Total passes446
243Passes accurate369
72Passes %83
Starting Lineups
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto1:1
Starting XI
43A. LastraG
28F. CobosD
22M. ValienteM
9J. FerreiraF
31M. ValentiD
10T. GonzalezM
17G. AlanisF
30S. OjedaD
5A. CabreraM
45R. LozanoD
35F. GallardoM
Instituto Cordoba1:1
Starting XI
28M. RoffoG
6F. R. AlarconD
3D. SosaM
21J. LazaroF
29F. JaraF
26L. MosevichD
19G. A. LodicoM
20J. E. Cordoba MosqueraF
30J. GalvanD
55G. AbreguM
44G. CeratoM
Head-to-Head
0
Wins
1
Draws
1
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto
Form: L-L-L-D-D
Instituto Cordoba
Form: D-L-W-W-W
Record
1 W
2 D
7 L
•
4 W
2 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
0.4
Scored
vs
1.0
Scored
1.1
Conceded
vs
1.0
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
20%
BTTS
40%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:0.7
Away:0.0
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.0
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:0.6
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:1.2
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1460
Average
1533
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1425
↓ Momentum (-36)
1543
↑ Momentum (+10)
Expected Outcome
27%
Home Win
31%
Draw
42%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1468
Attack
1479
1486
Defence
1542
Recent Form
1446
Attack
1484
1480
Defence
1559
Post-Match Changes
-14
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

