Sat, 28 Feb 2026, 08:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
25'
Card upgrade
26'
Yellow Card
38'
Normal Goal → Motoki Hasegawa
57'
Substitution 1 → Yumeki Yokoyama
57'
Substitution 2 → Motohiko Nakajima
64'
Substitution 1 → Diego Pituca
64'
Substitution 2 → Yuto Iwasaki
66'
Yellow Card
71'
Substitution 3 → Nelson Ishiwatari
75'
Substitution 3 → Ryogo Yamasaki
75'
Substitution 4 → Kazuki Kushibiki
81'
Substitution 4 → Hayato Okuda
81'
Substitution 5 → Kusini Yengi
89'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal4
9Shots off Goal3
22Total Shots14
7Blocked Shots7
10Shots insidebox8
12Shots outsidebox6
6Fouls11
8Corner Kicks4
1Offsides0
42Ball Possession58
1Yellow Cards2
4Goalkeeper Saves5
413Total passes583
316Passes accurate489
77Passes %84
Starting Lineups
V-varen NagasakiUnknown
Starting XI
1Masaaki GotoG
22Hijiri OnagaD
50Ryosuke ShindoD
6Yusei EgawaD
23Shunya YonedaD
24Riku YamadaM
5Hotaru YamaguchiM
11Norman CampbellM
10Matheus JesusM
41Motoki HasegawaM
9Thiago SantanaF
Cerezo OsakaUnknown
Starting XI
23Kosuke NakamuraG
27Dion CoolsD
4Rikito InoueD
44Shinnosuke HatanakaD
66Ayumu OhataD
8Shinji KagawaM
10Shunta TanakaM
17Reiya SakataM
48Masaya ShibayamaM
11Thiago AndradeM
9Solomon SakuragawaF
Head-to-Head
3
Wins
0
Draws
5
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
V-varen Nagasaki
Form: W-L-L-W-D
Cerezo Osaka
Form: L-W-D-L-L
Record
5 W
2 D
3 L
•
4 W
1 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
1.8
Scored
vs
1.5
Scored
1.0
Conceded
vs
1.4
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:1.7
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:0.8
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.4
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1451
Average
1552
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1418
↓ Momentum (-33)
1539
↓ Momentum (-13)
Expected Outcome
25%
Home Win
30%
Draw
45%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1484
Attack
1491
1474
Defence
1508
Recent Form
1475
Attack
1491
1455
Defence
1497
Post-Match Changes
+15
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

