Sun, 5 Apr 2026, 06:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time (Penalties)
Match Timeline
40'
Daihachi Okamuraπ¨Yellow Card
63'
Kashif BangnagandeπSubstitution 1 β Kento Hashimoto
63'
Kyota TokiwaπSubstitution 2 β Takahiro Ko
63'
Keita EndoπSubstitution 3 β Divine Chinedu Otani
70'
Marcelo RyanπSubstitution 4 β Teruhito Nakagawa
82'
Neta LaviπSubstitution 1 β Hokuto Shimoda
82'
Tete YengiπSubstitution 2 β Shota Fujio
84'
Yuki SomaπSubstitution 3 β Futa Tokumura
89'
Kein SatoπSubstitution 5 β Fuki Yamada
90'
Gen ShojiπSubstitution 4 β Ibrahim DreΕ‘eviΔ
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal3
3Shots off Goal7
6Total Shots12
1Blocked Shots2
4Shots insidebox7
2Shots outsidebox5
6Fouls8
1Corner Kicks7
3Offsides1
60Ball Possession40
0Yellow Cards1
3Goalkeeper Saves2
535Total passes338
459Passes accurate270
86Passes %80
Starting Lineups
FC Tokyo1:1
Starting XI
81Seung-gyu KimG
6Kashif BangnagandeD
22Keita EndoM
23Ryunosuke SatoF
17Hayato InamuraD
27Kyota TokiwaM
9Marcelo RyanF
24Alexander ScholzD
37Kei KoizumiM
2Sei MuroyaD
16Kein SatoM
Machida Zelvia1:1
Starting XI
1Kosei TaniG
19Yuta NakayamaD
26Kotaro HayashiM
7Yuki SomaF
99Tete YengiF
50Daihachi OkamuraD
31Neta LaviM
10Sang-Ho NaF
3Gen ShojiD
16Hiroyuki MaeM
88Hotaka NakamuraM
Head-to-Head
2
Wins
2
Draws
3
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
FC Tokyo
Form: W-D-W-D-W
Machida Zelvia
Form: L-D-W-L-W
Record
5 W
4 D
1 L
β’
5 W
3 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
1.7
Scored
vs
1.2
Scored
1.0
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.8
Away:1.6
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:0.6
Scored
Home:1.2
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.7
Away:0.8
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1540
Average
1537
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1538
β Momentum (-2)
1549
β Momentum (+13)
Expected Outcome
33%
Home Win
35%
Draw
32%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1505
Attack
1498
1597
Defence
1572
Recent Form
1508
Attack
1491
1645
Defence
1538
Post-Match Changes
+2
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.