Sun, 3 May 2026, 08:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
29'
Normal Goal → M. Hasegawa
34'
Normal Goal → S. Sugiura
46'
Substitution 1 → N. Campbell
46'
Substitution 1 → H. Koda
53'
Substitution 2 → H. Teruyama
54'
Normal Goal → K. Mikuni
63'
Substitution 3 → Matheus Jesus
64'
Substitution 4 → T. Kasayanagi
72'
Substitution 2 → K. Sakakibara
74'
Substitution 5 → Diego Pituca
79'
Substitution 3 → Y. Sato
79'
Substitution 4 → Y. Kimura
80'
Yellow Card
86'
Substitution 5 → A. Kawazura
Match Statistics
9Shots on Goal6
6Shots off Goal3
18Total Shots12
3Blocked Shots3
8Shots insidebox7
10Shots outsidebox5
12Fouls3
9Corner Kicks9
0Offsides3
50Ball Possession50
1Yellow Cards0
4Goalkeeper Saves7
390Total passes400
279Passes accurate309
72Passes %77
Starting Lineups
V-varen Nagasaki1:1
Starting XI
1Goto MasaakiG
4EduardoD
23Yoneda ShunyaM
41Motoki HasegawaF
9Thiago SantanaF
29Arai IkkiD
5Yamaguchi HotaruM
34Tenmu MatsumotoF
22Onaga HijiriD
24Riku YamadaM
3Masahiro SekiguchiM
Nagoya Grampus1:1
Starting XI
35Alexandre PisanoG
55Shuhei TokumotoD
66Ryosuke YamanakaM
18Kensuke NagaiF
30Shungo SugiuraF
20Kennedy Egbus MikuniD
17Takuya UchidaM
33Taichi KikuchiF
2Yuki NogamiD
41Masahito OnoM
44Soichiro MoriM
Head-to-Head
3
Wins
1
Draws
2
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
V-varen Nagasaki
Form: W-D-L-L-L
Nagoya Grampus
Form: D-W-D-L-W
Record
4 W
1 D
5 L
•
4 W
4 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
0.9
Scored
vs
1.9
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:0.8
Away:1.0
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.4
Scored
Home:1.6
Away:2.2
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.2
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1459
Average
1564
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1443
↓ Momentum (-16)
1556
↓ Momentum (-8)
Expected Outcome
25%
Home Win
29%
Draw
46%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1463
Attack
1499
1487
Defence
1526
Recent Form
1435
Attack
1513
1482
Defence
1519
Post-Match Changes
-12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

