Wed, 6 May 2026, 07:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
13'
Substitution 1 → Shu Morooka
19'
Yellow Card
30'
Red Card
34'
Substitution 1 → Takahiro Iida
46'
Substitution 2 → Yamamota Hayata
58'
Normal Goal → Tae-hyeon Kim
62'
Substitution 3 → Teruhiro Sasaki
68'
Substitution 2 → Ryotaro Araki
69'
Substitution 3 → Yuma Suzuki
71'
Normal Goal → Koki Anzai
73'
Substitution 4 → Patryck Ferreira
73'
Substitution 5 → Koki Ando
79'
Normal Goal → Yuma Suzuki
82'
Substitution 4 → Kimito Nono
83'
Substitution 5 → Ryoya Ogawa
Match Statistics
7Shots on Goal2
6Shots off Goal2
17Total Shots6
4Blocked Shots2
12Shots insidebox4
5Shots outsidebox2
10Fouls12
6Corner Kicks2
2Offsides1
70Ball Possession30
1Yellow Cards0
0Red Cards1
2Goalkeeper Saves4
579Total passes244
505Passes accurate170
87Passes %70
Starting Lineups
Kashima1:1
Starting XI
1Tomoki HayakawaG
2Koki AnzaiD
24Haruki HayashiM
9Léo CearáF
3Tae-hyeon KimD
6Kento MisaoM
11Kyosuke TagawaF
55Naomichi UedaD
14Yuta HiguchiM
25Ryuta KoikeD
77Aleksandar ČavrićM
Mito Hollyhock1:1
Starting XI
34Konosuke NishikawaG
7Sho OmoriD
14Mizuki AraiM
10Arata WatanabeF
4Takeshi UshizawaD
3Koshi OsakiM
9Ryo NemotoF
17Kenta ItakuraD
19Taishi SembaM
25Takumi MaseD
70Matheus LeiriaM
Head-to-Head
2
Wins
2
Draws
0
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Kashima
Form: D-L-W-W-W
Mito Hollyhock
Form: D-D-L-W-D
Record
7 W
2 D
1 L
•
2 W
5 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
1.5
Scored
vs
1.1
Scored
0.5
Conceded
vs
1.6
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
60%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:1.6
Conceded
Home:0.4
Away:0.6
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:2.4
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1721
Good
1533
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1789
↑ Momentum (+67)
1582
↑ Momentum (+50)
Expected Outcome
56%
Home Win
25%
Draw
19%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1554
Attack
1507
1686
Defence
1501
Recent Form
1556
Attack
1527
1715
Defence
1512
Post-Match Changes
+5
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

