Sat, 9 May 2026, 05:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
24'
Normal Goal
26'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 β Matheus Leiria
50'
Card upgrade
51'
Red Card
52'
Substitution 2 β Koshi Osaki
53'
Substitution 1 β Takuro Kaneko
53'
Substitution 2 β Shoya Nakajima
70'
Normal Goal β Yoichi Naganuma
76'
Substitution 3 β Isaac Thelin
77'
Normal Goal β Jumpei Hayakawa
77'
Substitution 3 β Koki Ando
77'
Substitution 4 β Patryck Ferreira
79'
Normal Goal β Jumpei Hayakawa
81'
Yellow Card
82'
Substitution 4 β Yusuke Matsuo
82'
Substitution 5 β Hirokazu Ishihara
84'
Normal Goal
90'
Substitution 5 β Ryo Nemoto
Match Statistics
2Shots on Goal7
2Shots off Goal4
5Total Shots17
1Blocked Shots6
5Shots insidebox8
0Shots outsidebox9
7Fouls6
0Corner Kicks7
34Ball Possession66
2Yellow Cards0
1Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves1
367Total passes716
301Passes accurate640
82Passes %89
Starting Lineups
Mito Hollyhock1:1
Starting XI
34K. NishikawaG
7S. OmoriD
48Y. YamashitaM
44K. OkudaF
29K. TadaF
17K. ItakuraD
82K. KawakamiM
11Y. TorikaiF
89K. SasakiD
24K. YamazakiM
39H. YamamotoM
Urawa1:1
Starting XI
1S. NishikawaG
88Y. NaganumaD
25K. YasuiM
8Matheus SavioM
17H. KomoriF
5K. NemotoD
11S. GustafsonM
13R. WatanabeM
2Y. MiyamotoD
39J. HayakawaM
3Danilo BozaD
Head-to-Head
0
Wins
0
Draws
3
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Mito Hollyhock
Form: L-D-D-L-W
Urawa
Form: W-W-W-L-L
Record
2 W
5 D
3 L
β’
3 W
2 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
1.1
Scored
vs
1.2
Scored
1.7
Conceded
vs
1.2
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
30%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:0.8
Away:2.6
Scored
Home:1.5
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.3
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1533
Average
1612
Good
Short Term Elo Rating
1582
β Momentum (+50)
1612
β Stable
Expected Outcome
27%
Home Win
30%
Draw
43%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1507
Attack
1535
1489
Defence
1611
Recent Form
1527
Attack
1545
1485
Defence
1615
Post-Match Changes
-14
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

