Sun, 10 May 2026, 07:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
9'
Normal Goal → Katsuhiro Nakayama
28'
Yellow Card
29'
Normal Goal
36'
Yellow Card
44'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 → João Pedro
46'
Substitution 2 → Rafael Elias
46'
Substitution 3 → Fuchi Honda
57'
Substitution 4 → Ryuma Nakano
59'
Substitution 1 → Yuki Nogami
60'
Substitution 2 → Hidemasa Koda
67'
Substitution 5 → Taiyo Hiraoka
69'
Substitution 3 → Takuya Uchida
89'
Substitution 4 → Kensuke Nagai
89'
Substitution 5 → Masahito Ono
90'
Normal Goal → Hidemasa Koda
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal5
3Shots off Goal3
14Total Shots10
5Blocked Shots2
11Shots insidebox6
3Shots outsidebox4
12Fouls7
8Corner Kicks5
1Offsides1
38Ball Possession62
1Yellow Cards2
5Goalkeeper Saves3
257Total passes440
180Passes accurate350
70Passes %80
Starting Lineups
Nagoya Grampus1:1
Starting XI
1Daniel SchmidtG
55Shuhei TokumotoD
27Katsuhiro NakayamaM
22Yudai KimuraF
11Yuya YamagishiF
13Haruya FujiiD
31Tomoki TakamineM
7Ryuji IzumiF
70Teruki HaraD
15Sho InagakiM
9Yuya AsanoM
Kyoto Sanga1:1
Starting XI
1Gakuji OtaG
44Kyo SatoD
39Taiki HiratoM
18Temma MatsudaF
34Henrique TrevisanD
25Sung-jun YoonM
88BarretoF
50Yoshinori SuzukiD
8Takuji YonemotoM
7Masaya OkugawaF
22Hidehiro SugaiD
Head-to-Head
5
Wins
6
Draws
4
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Nagoya Grampus
Form: W-W-D-W-D
Kyoto Sanga
Form: D-L-D-L-W
Record
5 W
3 D
2 L
•
2 W
3 D
5 L
Goals Per Game
1.7
Scored
vs
1.2
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
0%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
70%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.7
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.3
Scored
Home:1.8
Away:0.6
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.6
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1575
Average
1539
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1584
↑ Momentum (+9)
1550
↑ Momentum (+11)
Expected Outcome
37%
Home Win
33%
Draw
30%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1506
Attack
1511
1533
Defence
1552
Recent Form
1526
Attack
1525
1533
Defence
1522
Post-Match Changes
+12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

