Sun, 24 May 2026, 05:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
46'
Substitution 1 → Marcinho
46'
Substitution 2 → Kyosuke Mochiyama
58'
Normal Goal → Sota Miura
61'
Substitution 1 → Yamamota Hayata
61'
Substitution 2 → Ryo Nemoto
69'
Substitution 3 → Koki Ando
76'
Goal cancelled
78'
Normal Goal
79'
Substitution 4 → Tada Keisuke
79'
Substitution 5 → Patryck Ferreira
82'
Substitution 3 → So Kawahara
85'
Normal Goal → So Kawahara
88'
Substitution 4 → Ryuki Osa
89'
Substitution 5 → Soma Kanda
90+1'
Normal Goal → Danilo Cardoso
Match Statistics
3Shots on Goal5
6Shots off Goal9
11Total Shots17
2Blocked Shots3
5Shots insidebox11
6Shots outsidebox6
11Fouls10
4Corner Kicks3
0Offsides2
43Ball Possession57
2Goalkeeper Saves2
399Total passes540
306Passes accurate447
77Passes %83
Starting Lineups
Mito Hollyhock1:1
Starting XI
34Konosuke NishikawaG
7Sho OmoriD
14Mizuki AraiM
11Yoshiki TorikaiF
17Kenta ItakuraD
8Chihiro KatoM
10Arata WatanabeF
2Danilo CardosoD
19Taishi SembaM
25Takumi MaseD
70Matheus LeiriaM
Kawasaki Frontale1:1
Starting XI
1Louis YamaguchiG
13Sota MiuraD
6Yuki YamamotoM
24Ten MiyagiM
91Lazar RomanićF
28Yuichi MaruyamaD
8Kento TachibanadaM
14Yasuto WakizakaM
2Yuto MatsunaganeD
17Tatsuya ItoM
29Reon YamaharaD
Head-to-Head
0
Wins
2
Draws
2
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Mito Hollyhock
Form: L-L-L-D-D
Kawasaki Frontale
Form: D-L-W-L-L
Record
1 W
4 D
5 L
•
4 W
2 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.0
Scored
vs
1.0
Scored
2.1
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.2
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:2.6
Scored
Home:1.4
Away:0.6
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.4
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1504
Average
1596
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1505
→ Stable
1579
↓ Momentum (-16)
Expected Outcome
26%
Home Win
30%
Draw
44%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1493
Attack
1600
1476
Defence
1498
Recent Form
1493
Attack
1581
1462
Defence
1513
Post-Match Changes
-12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

