🟨
Nottingham Forest W2-2Watford W
Sun, 23 Aug 2026, 19:00
Full Time

Match Timeline

1'
D. Lacy
Normal Goal → B. Destin
4'
R. Mora-Arias🟨
Yellow Card
6'
J. Griffin🟨
Yellow Card
13'
B. Destin
Normal Goal → A. Monis
20'
S. Olivas🟨
Yellow Card
24'
K. LeBlanc🟨
Yellow Card
44'
B. Destin🟨
Yellow Card
45+2'
B. Tanyi
Normal Goal → R. Van Hees
45+3'
B. Destin
Normal Goal → B. Tanyi
46'
W. Ferreira🔄
Substitution 1 → M. De Paula
46'
F. Sundstrom🔄
Substitution 2 → K. Moore
48'
K. Moore🟨
Yellow Card
51'
R. Mora-Arias🔄
Substitution 1 → W. Agostoni
54'
B. Tanyi🟨
Yellow Card
55'
S. Korzeniowski
Penalty
58'
S. Korzeniowski🟨
Yellow Card
61'
S. Korzeniowski
Normal Goal → M. De Paula
65'
S. Olivas🔄
Substitution 3 → T. Reed
68'
J. Stephenson🔄
Substitution 2 → M. Boamah
69'
S. Sserwadda🟨
Yellow Card
70'
D. Lacy🔄
Substitution 3 → J. Ping
70'
B. Destin🔄
Substitution 4
70'
A. Wolanski🔄
Substitution 5 → N. Che
73'
A. Diop🔄
Substitution 4 → I. Mendoza
84'
K. LeBlanc🟨
Yellow Card
84'
K. LeBlanc🟥
Red Card
84'
B. Tanyi🔄
Substitution 6 → Caua Paixao
85'
Unknown Player🟨
Yellow Card
90+4'
O. Benitez🔄
Substitution 5 → M. Berthe
90+5'
J. Griffin🔄
Substitution 6 → T. Gladstone
90+12'
A. Monis🟨
Yellow Card

Head-to-Head

📈 Team Form & Statistics

Philadelphia Union II
Philadelphia Union II
Form: W-W-D-L-L
Connecticut FC
Connecticut FC
Form: W-W-L-W-W
Record
4 W
2 D
4 L
8 W
0 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
1.3
Scored
vs
2.5
Scored
1.8
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
80%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:0.7
Away:1.6
Conceded
Home:0.7
Away:2.3
Scored
Home:2.5
Away:2.5
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:1.0

⚡ Elo Ratings

Long Term Elo Rating
1566
Average
1505
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1551
↓ Momentum (-15)
1528
↑ Momentum (+23)
Expected Outcome
40%
Home Win
32%
Draw
28%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1496
Attack
1513
1548
Defence
1497
Recent Form
1450
Attack
1536
1542
Defence
1513
Post-Match Changes
-14
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.