Sat, 29 Aug 2026, 10:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
8'
Normal Goal
10'
Yellow Card
30'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 → Maejima Yota
57'
Substitution 2 → Shosei Usui
62'
Substitution 1 → Temma Matsuda
62'
Substitution 2 → Shun Nagasawa
63'
Normal Goal → Rafael Elias
67'
Yellow Card
68'
Substitution 3 → Keiya Shiihashi
68'
Substitution 4 → Shintaro Nago
75'
Yellow Card
81'
Substitution 5 → Abdel Hanan Sani Brown
86'
Own Goal
89'
Substitution 3 → Shimpei Fukuoka
89'
Substitution 4 → Kodai Nagata
90'
Substitution 5 → Fuchi Honda
Match Statistics
3Shots on Goal9
5Shots off Goal7
9Total Shots19
1Blocked Shots3
2Shots insidebox14
7Shots outsidebox5
7Fouls11
1Corner Kicks6
1Offsides0
43Ball Possession57
1Yellow Cards3
8Goalkeeper Saves1
356Total passes457
256Passes accurate346
72Passes %76
Starting Lineups
Kyoto Sanga1:1
Starting XI
90HallsG
44Kyo SatoD
25Sung-jun YoonM
48Ryuma NakanoM
9Rafael EliasF
50Yoshinori SuzukiD
6João PedroM
38MaceióM
43WevertonD
77Haruki AraiM
2Shinnosuke FukudaD
Avispa Fukuoka1:1
Starting XI
1Takumi NagaishiG
15Yuma TsujiokaD
22Kazuki FujimotoM
6Masato ShigemiF
9Werik PopóF
16Teppei OkaD
11Tomoya MikiM
13Shu MorookaF
23Daiki FukazawaD
55Kokoro MaedaM
47Yu HashimotoM
Head-to-Head
13
Wins
4
Draws
10
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Kyoto Sanga
Form: W-L-D-L-L
Avispa Fukuoka
Form: D-L-W-L-W
Record
3 W
1 D
6 L
•
3 W
3 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
1.0
Scored
vs
1.4
Scored
2.2
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:1.0
Conceded
Home:2.8
Away:1.3
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:1.7
Conceded
Home:1.1
Away:1.7
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1509
Average
1514
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1473
↓ Momentum (-37)
1510
↓ Momentum (-5)
Expected Outcome
32%
Home Win
35%
Draw
33%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1495
Attack
1437
1504
Defence
1564
Recent Form
1485
Attack
1452
1442
Defence
1553
Post-Match Changes
+12
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

