Sat, 5 Sept 2026, 10:00
J1 League
Japan
Full Time
Match Timeline
45+1'
Yellow Card
50'
Yellow Card
53'
Normal Goal β Daiki Fukazawa
54'
Substitution 1 β Koshi Osaki
57'
Yellow Card
62'
Substitution 1 β Shintaro Nago
63'
Substitution 2 β Keiya Shiihashi
63'
Substitution 3 β Yota Maejima
69'
Substitution 2 β Patryck Ferreira
69'
Substitution 3 β Chihiro Kato
69'
Substitution 4 β Hayata Yamamoto
70'
Yellow Card
77'
Substitution 4 β Daiki Miya
82'
Yellow Card
85'
Substitution 5 β Ryo Nemoto
86'
Normal Goal β Sho Omori
89'
Substitution 5 β Kazuki Fujimoto
Match Statistics
293Passes accurate350
10Shots insidebox8
6Shots outsidebox2
1Blocked Shots3
17Free Kicks11
5Shots on Goal4
3Goalkeeper Saves4
10Shots off Goal3
1Offsides2
378Total passes439
16Total Shots10
2Yellow Cards3
5Corner Kicks2
11Fouls18
0Red Cards0
46Ball Possession54
Starting Lineups
Avispa Fukuoka1:1
Starting XI
41K. FujitaG
15Y. TsujiokaD
23D. FukazawaM
6M. ShigemiM
9Werik PopΓ³F
37M. TashiroD
11T. MikiM
13S. MorookaM
16T. OkaD
55K. MaedaM
47Y. HashimotoM
Mito Hollyhock1:1
Starting XI
34K. NishikawaG
7S. OmoriD
22K. TaniguchiM
18K. UchinoF
4A. KawazuraD
20Y. FunabashiM
10A. WatanabeF
15Y. KimotoD
19T. SembaM
25T. MaseD
11Y. TorikaiM
Head-to-Head
5
Wins
8
Draws
5
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Avispa Fukuoka
Form: L-L-D-L-W
Mito Hollyhock
Form: W-D-L-W-D
Record
3 W
2 D
5 L
β’
2 W
2 D
6 L
Goals Per Game
1.6
Scored
vs
1.1
Scored
1.6
Conceded
vs
1.5
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
0%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
60%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.6
Away:1.7
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:2.0
Scored
Home:1.0
Away:1.3
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:1.3
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1501
Average
1503
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1476
β Momentum (-25)
1516
β Momentum (+13)
Expected Outcome
32%
Home Win
35%
Draw
33%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1447
Attack
1494
1539
Defence
1488
Recent Form
1469
Attack
1501
1503
Defence
1493
Post-Match Changes
-1
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

