Tue, 21 Jul 2026, 18:30
Full Time
Match Timeline
4'
Normal Goal β J. Mitchell
38'
Normal Goal
39'
Penalty cancelled
46'
Substitution 1 β O. Kiteishvili
47'
Yellow Card
50'
Normal Goal β O. Kiteishvili
53'
Normal Goal β J. Hodl
56'
Yellow Card
59'
Substitution 1 β S. Kerjota
59'
Substitution 2 β A. Ba-Sy
59'
Substitution 3 β S. Guendouz
59'
Normal Goal β L. Weinhandl
70'
Substitution 2 β R. Fosso
70'
Substitution 3 β N. Weiper
70'
Substitution 4 β A. Kayombo
75'
Substitution 4 β T. Renaud
79'
Substitution 5 β A. Malic
84'
Substitution 5 β T. Magnusson
86'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal6
9Shots off Goal8
20Total Shots19
5Blocked Shots5
16Shots insidebox11
4Shots outsidebox8
18Fouls13
4Corner Kicks12
0Offsides2
33Ball Possession67
1Yellow Cards2
6Goalkeeper Saves2
221Total passes438
145Passes accurate351
66Passes %80
Starting Lineups
Sturm Graz1:1
Starting XI
53D. KhudyakovG
18E. SogloD
43J. HodlM
20S. JattaF
2J. MitchellD
39L. WeinhandlM
17S. WlodarczykF
5A. VallciD
4J. Gorenc StankovicM
28J. HeilD
19S. SeidlM
Heart Of Midlothian1:1
Starting XI
1A. SchwolowG
18H. MilneD
6O. McEnteeM
89A. KyziridisM
11P. KaboreF
5J. McCartD
16B. SpittalM
10C. BragaM
64M. Fagan-WalcottD
7C. MillerM
2C. BorchgrevinkD
Head-to-Head
2
Wins
0
Draws
0
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Sturm Graz
Form: W-W-W-D-L
Heart Of Midlothian
Form: W-L-L-W-D
Record
6 W
3 D
1 L
β’
6 W
2 D
2 L
Goals Per Game
2.6
Scored
vs
1.8
Scored
1.4
Conceded
vs
1.2
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
30%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
70%
BTTS
80%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:2.6
Away:2.5
Conceded
Home:1.4
Away:1.5
Scored
Home:2.2
Away:1.4
Conceded
Home:0.6
Away:1.8
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1500
Average
1500
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1500
β Stable
1500
β Stable
Expected Outcome
33%
Home Win
34%
Draw
33%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1500
Attack
1500
1500
Defence
1500
Recent Form
1500
Attack
1500
1500
Defence
1500
Post-Match Changes
+13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

