Sun, 23 Aug 2026, 16:30
Jupiler Pro League
Belgium
Full Time
Match Timeline
37'
N. Tresoldiβ½Normal Goal β C. Forbs
64'
G. MagneeπSubstitution 1 β T. Adaramola
70'
M. DiakhonπSubstitution 1 β F. Lemarechal
70'
H. VetlesenπSubstitution 2 β J. Virgili
71'
Makaya Ibrahima DiabyPenalty cancelled
76'
D. VanzeirπSubstitution 2 β K. Kouassi
77'
S. NgouraπSubstitution 3 β L. Michal
80'
Makaya Ibrahima Diabyπ¨Yellow Card
87'
V. KonateπSubstitution 4 β Erick Nunes
87'
L. MondeleπSubstitution 5 β L. Agyekum
89'
N. TresoldiπSubstitution 3 β R. Vermant
Match Statistics
4Shots on Goal4
3Shots off Goal3
15Total Shots11
8Blocked Shots4
11Shots insidebox7
4Shots outsidebox4
3Fouls14
9Corner Kicks4
2Offsides1
80Ball Possession20
0Yellow Cards1
4Goalkeeper Saves3
775Total passes191
692Passes accurate127
89Passes %66
1.83expected_goals0.76
0.06goals_prevented0.06
Starting Lineups
Club Brugge KV1:1
Starting XI
1Y. SommerG
65J. SeysD
20H. VanakenM
67M. DiakhonM
7N. TresoldiF
44B. MecheleD
8F. PottsM
10H. VetlesenM
3Lee Han-BeomD
9C. ForbsM
64K. SabbeD
Cercle Brugge1:1
Starting XI
1G. CouckeG
24G. KondoD
12V. KonateM
71V. MartensF
9S. NgouraF
66C. RavychD
19I. DiabyM
13D. VanzeirF
2I. DiakiteD
42L. MondeleM
15G. MagneeM
Head-to-Head
16
Wins
8
Draws
2
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Club Brugge KV
Form: W-W-D-L-L
Cercle Brugge
Form: D-D-D-L-L
Record
5 W
2 D
3 L
β’
2 W
4 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
2.7
Scored
vs
1.9
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
2.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
0%
BTTS
60%
BTTS
90%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:3.3
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.0
Away:1.8
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:2.0
Away:2.5
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1789
Good
1489
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1865
β Momentum (+76)
1465
β Momentum (-24)
Expected Outcome
67%
Home Win
21%
Draw
12%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1718
Attack
1532
1657
Defence
1472
Recent Form
1791
Attack
1575
1684
Defence
1428
Post-Match Changes
+5
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.