Sun, 6 Sept 2026, 14:00
Jupiler Pro League
Belgium
Full Time
Match Timeline
35'
Yellow Card
42'
Yellow Card
46'
Substitution 1 β M. Mbaye
55'
Yellow Card
57'
Yellow Card
62'
Red Card
62'
Card upgrade
63'
Yellow Card
66'
Substitution 2 β B. De Jaegere
66'
Substitution 3 β Z. Atrok
76'
Substitution 1 β B. Vroninks
76'
Substitution 2 β B. Lambert
76'
Substitution 3 β J. van Landschoot
85'
Substitution 4 β H. Akpa-Chukwu
90'
Normal Goal β A. Ementa
90'
Normal Goal β M. Mbaye
90+6'
Yellow Card
90+6'
Red Card
90+6'
Yellow Card
Match Statistics
3Shots on Goal5
3Shots off Goal4
9Total Shots12
3Blocked Shots3
3Shots insidebox8
6Shots outsidebox4
10Fouls14
6Corner Kicks6
3Offsides1
50Ball Possession50
2Yellow Cards5
2Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves3
400Total passes402
311Passes accurate302
78Passes %75
0.55expected_goals1.19
0.34goals_prevented0.34
Starting Lineups
Kortrijk1:1
Starting XI
31M. IlicG
4H. Murray-CampbellD
7S. PodgoreanuM
68T. AmbroseF
10G. KoyalipouF
22G. RuyssenD
19B. DejaegereM
17R. StormanF
21A. DrouhinD
24J. RocheM
36R. KohonM
Zulte Waregem1:1
Starting XI
1L. BostynG
55Y. CappelleD
36S. UjkaM
11M. AkeF
5J. KiilerichD
6E. LofolomoM
18A. EmentaF
4L. LemoineD
8T. ClaesM
20T. HedlF
49F. TangalaD
Head-to-Head
6
Wins
8
Draws
10
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Kortrijk
Form: L-L-L-D-L
Zulte Waregem
Form: D-W-D-W-D
Record
2 W
2 D
6 L
β’
6 W
4 D
0 L
Goals Per Game
0.9
Scored
vs
2.2
Scored
1.6
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
10%
Clean Sheets
20%
BTTS
50%
BTTS
80%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.3
Away:0.0
Conceded
Home:1.6
Away:1.7
Scored
Home:2.7
Away:1.5
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.3
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1479
Average
1529
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1454
β Momentum (-25)
1629
β Momentum (+101)
Expected Outcome
29%
Home Win
32%
Draw
39%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1490
Attack
1548
1475
Defence
1534
Recent Form
1479
Attack
1596
1456
Defence
1584
Post-Match Changes
-13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

