Thu, 13 Aug 2026, 17:00
Full Time
Match Timeline
6'
L. Hienβ½Normal Goal β L. O. Larsen
46'
L. O. LarsenπSubstitution 1 β H. Larsen
46'
I. DahlqvistπSubstitution 2 β A. Thongla-Iad Warneryd
46'
A. FicaπSubstitution 1 β F. Barrios
46'
A. CordeaπSubstitution 2 β M. Korenica
46'
C. BraunπSubstitution 3 β V. Kun
48'
I. Vadebuβ½Normal Goal β T. Nyhammer
49'
Adrian PΔunπ¨Yellow Card
62'
T. NyhammerπSubstitution 3 β A. L. Elvebu
63'
Meriton Korenicaπ¨Yellow Card
68'
A. PaunπSubstitution 4 β Bruno Costa
70'
Heine Asen Larsenπ¨Yellow Card
75'
D. EdvardssonπSubstitution 4 β M. Mikkelsen
76'
L. BilibocπSubstitution 5 β M. Miclaus
78'
M. Korenicaβ½Normal Goal β A. Sfait
84'
Ieltsin CamoesπSubstitution 5 β D. Braut
Match Statistics
6Shots on Goal1
7Shots off Goal2
6Blocked Shots1
17Fouls14
9Corner Kicks0
2Offsides0
68Ball Possession32
1Yellow Cards2
0Red Cards0
Starting Lineups
Tromso1:1
Starting XI
1J. HaugaardG
37S. InnvaerM
7L. O. LarsenF
10T. NyhammerM
30I. VadebuD
5D. EdvardssonM
20Ieltsin Camoes4:2
21L. HienD
8J. GrundtM
3M. TonnessenD
17I. DahlqvistM
CFR 1907 Cluj1:1
Starting XI
31O. ValceanuG
45M. CamoraD
10A. PaunM
17L. BilibocF
42R. PantalonD
88D. DjokovicM
77A. SfaitF
3A. AbeidD
8A. FicaM
11A. CordeaM
47C. BraunD
Head-to-Head
2
Wins
0
Draws
0
Wins
π Team Form & Statistics
Tromso
Form: W-W-L-L-W
CFR 1907 Cluj
Form: L-L-W-W-D
Record
5 W
2 D
3 L
β’
3 W
4 D
3 L
Goals Per Game
2.3
Scored
vs
1.4
Scored
1.3
Conceded
vs
1.3
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
40%
Clean Sheets
40%
BTTS
40%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:1.8
Away:2.7
Conceded
Home:0.5
Away:1.8
Scored
Home:2.0
Away:0.8
Conceded
Home:1.2
Away:1.4
β‘ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1500
Average
1500
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1500
β Stable
1497
β Momentum (-2)
Expected Outcome
33%
Home Win
35%
Draw
32%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1500
Attack
1500
1515
Defence
1503
Recent Form
1500
Attack
1498
1532
Defence
1502
Post-Match Changes
+13
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.