Fri, 1 May 2026, 18:00
Eredivisie
Netherlands
Full Time (Penalties)
Match Timeline
30'
Yellow Card
49'
Substitution 1 → J. Deom
52'
Normal Goal → J. P. Muller
61'
Substitution 1 → T. van der Leij
67'
Substitution 2 → J. Cooper-Love
68'
Substitution 3 → T. Kalinauskas
74'
Yellow Card
76'
Substitution 2 → M. Kramer
76'
Substitution 3 → R. van der Venne
81'
Substitution 4 → Y. van der Veen
84'
Substitution 4 → M. Paulissen
84'
Substitution 5 → R. El Meliani
85'
Yellow Card
90'
Substitution 5 → G. Roemeratoe
90'
Normal Goal → M. Kramer
98'
Substitution 6 → R. van Hedel
106'
Substitution 7 → D. van Kaam
106'
Substitution 6 → C. Seedorf
Match Statistics
10Shots on Goal3
8Shots off Goal2
27Total Shots6
9Blocked Shots1
15Shots insidebox3
12Shots outsidebox3
11Fouls19
10Corner Kicks6
2Offsides0
56Ball Possession44
1Yellow Cards2
2Goalkeeper Saves9
698Total passes546
571Passes accurate421
82Passes %77
Starting Lineups
Waalwijk1:1
Starting XI
1Y. van OschG
5J. Familia-CastilloD
14J. BoetiusM
7D. CleoniseM
9J. UnekenF
4L. van GelderenD
35L. PostmaM
20H. KusterM
3R. van EijmaD
12R. FageM
55N. HeldD
Roda1:1
Starting XI
1J. TreichelG
5K. JansenD
4J. NisbetM
11I. GriffithF
33D. Van den BuijsD
8J. P. MullerM
9A. van den HurkF
3M. TolD
15L. BeertenM
14M. BreijF
22J. KruiverD
Head-to-Head
4
Wins
4
Draws
5
Wins
📈 Team Form & Statistics
Record
5 W
3 D
2 L
•
2 W
4 D
4 L
Goals Per Game
2.5
Scored
vs
1.1
Scored
1.6
Conceded
vs
1.2
Conceded
Betting Indicators
Clean Sheets
20%
Clean Sheets
10%
BTTS
80%
BTTS
50%
Home/Away Performance
Scored
Home:3.3
Away:2.0
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.8
Scored
Home:0.7
Away:1.8
Conceded
Home:1.3
Away:1.0
⚡ Elo Ratings
Long Term Elo Rating
1478
Average
1495
Average
Short Term Elo Rating
1493
↑ Momentum (+15)
1487
↓ Momentum (-8)
Expected Outcome
31%
Home Win
34%
Draw
35%
Away Win
Attack & Defence Elo
Long Term
1478
Attack
1492
1451
Defence
1504
Recent Form
1492
Attack
1482
1453
Defence
1510
Post-Match Changes
+1
Rating Change
0
Rating Change
Elo ratings measure team strength based on match results and opponent quality. Higher ratings indicate stronger teams.

